if your good at one type of map only lets say bgh but suck at other maps are you still considered good?

what about if you play good in team games but cant 1v1, still considered a pro?

i would say this can be debated because, the wcg type maps are more strategic thus requiring more skills, however if your good at lets say bgh, you could still be considered good in general if you aquire micro/macro skills.

whats micro/macro skills? i never heard of that- and in my oppinion- the better the player is at each individual skill the better ranked he is.

i believe micro means how well you can move your units, and macro is pretty much list of commands like amount of grouping units, and how well you can group them together and workt with the group of units your working with

i think i understand now

Macro-management (macro): All activities concerning economy, research, maintaining food limits, base development, and base expansion.

Micro-management (micro): All activities concerning military forces including troop movement, troop construction, attacking, defending, and scout of enemy forces.

I consider a good player someone who can easily adapt and react with smart and quick counter strats, also of course someone with good micro and macro and multitasking ability.